This is homework 3, due Monday, October 17, at the beginning of lecture.

Recall the Baire category theorem: The intersection of countably many dense open sets in a complete metric space is dense. Recall that a set is one that can be written as the intersection of countably many open sets.

Show that in a complete metric space, the intersection of countably many dense sets is again a dense set. Is the union of two sets again a set?

Show that is not a subset of .

Since is countable, we can enumerate it as . For let

Note that each is open, that for each , that , and that (for each ) the sum of the lengths of the intervals that make up is at most .

Does this mean that ? If yes, please provide a proof. If not, describe as concretely as possible an irrational number that belongs to this intersection.

Recall that a nowhere dense set is a set whose closure has empty interior: . A set is meager (or of the first category) iff it is the union of countably many nowhere dense sets. Given sets and in , we say that iff their symmetric difference is meager. For example, the Cantor set is nowhere dense.

Show that is an equivalence relation.

Show that if is meager, then any subset of is also meager. Show that the union of countably many meager sets is again meager.

Show that the Baire category theorem implies that any nonempty open subset of is non-meager.

Show that if is open, or closed, or a set, or a set (a countable union of closed sets), then there is an open set such that .

The Cantor-Bendixson derivative of a closed set is defined by

Since is closed, . We can iterate this operation, and form , Note we have

We can go even further, by letting and then continuing, by setting , etc.

Give examples of closed subsets of such that but , or but , or or but . Can be the first empty “derivative”? How about ?

Check that if and are compact, then so is as a subset of .

Show that if is a subset of that is both open and closed, and , then it must be the case that .

43.614000-116.202000

Advertisements

Like this:

LikeLoading...

Related

This entry was posted on Friday, October 7th, 2011 at 4:18 pm and is filed under 414/514: Analysis I. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

(As I pointed out in a comment) yes, partial Woodinness is common in arguments in inner model theory. Accordingly, you obtain determinacy results addressing specific pointclasses (typically, well beyond projective). To illustrate this, let me "randomly" highlight two examples: See here for $\Sigma^1_2$-Woodin cardinals and, more generally, the noti […]

I am not sure which statement you heard as the "Ultimate $L$ axiom," but I will assume it is the following version: There is a proper class of Woodin cardinals, and for all sentences $\varphi$ that hold in $V$, there is a universally Baire set $A\subseteq{\mathbb R}$ such that, letting $\theta=\Theta^{L(A,{\mathbb R})}$, we have that $HOD^{L(A,{\ma […]

A Wadge initial segment (of $\mathcal P(\mathbb R)$) is a subset $\Gamma$ of $\mathcal P(\mathbb R)$ such that whenever $A\in\Gamma$ and $B\le_W A$, where $\le_W$ denotes Wadge reducibility, then $B\in\Gamma$. Note that if $\Gamma\subseteq\mathcal P(\mathbb R)$ and $L(\Gamma,\mathbb R)\models \Gamma=\mathcal P(\mathbb R)$, then $\Gamma$ is a Wadge initial se […]

Craig: For a while, there was some research on improving bounds on the number of variables or degree of unsolvable Diophantine equations. Unfortunately, I never got around to cataloging the known results in any systematic way, so all I can offer is some pointers to relevant references, but I am not sure of what the current records are. Perhaps the first pape […]

Yes. Consider, for instance, Conway's base 13 function $c$, or any function that is everywhere discontinuous and has range $\mathbb R$ in every interval. Pick continuous bijections $f_n:\mathbb R\to(-1/n,1/n)$ for $n\in\mathbb N^+$. Pick a strictly decreasing sequence $(x_n)_{n\ge1}$ converging to $0$. Define $f$ by setting $f(x)=0$ if $x=0$ or $\pm x_n […]

All proofs of the Bernstein-Cantor-Schroeder theorem that I know either directly or with very little work produce an explicit bijection from any given pair of injections. There is an obvious injection from $[0,1]$ to $C[0,1]$ mapping each $t$ to the function constantly equal to $t$, so the question reduces to finding an explicit injection from $C[0,1]$ to $[ […]

One way we formalize this "limitation" idea is via interpretative power. John Steel describes this approach carefully in several places, so you may want to read what he says, in particular at Solomon Feferman, Harvey M. Friedman, Penelope Maddy, and John R. Steel. Does mathematics need new axioms?, The Bulletin of Symbolic Logic, 6 (4), (2000), 401 […]

"There are" examples of discontinuous homomorphisms between Banach algebras. However, the quotes are there because the question is independent of the usual axioms of set theory. I quote from the introduction to W. Hugh Woodin, "A discontinuous homomorphism from $C(X)$ without CH", J. London Math. Soc. (2) 48 (1993), no. 2, 299-315, MR1231 […]

This is Hausdorff's formula. Recall that $\tau^\lambda$ is the cardinality of the set ${}^\lambda\tau$ of functions $f\!:\lambda\to\tau$, and that $\kappa^+$ is regular for all $\kappa$. Now, there are two possibilities: If $\alpha\ge\tau$, then $2^\alpha\le\tau^\alpha\le(2^\alpha)^\alpha=2^\alpha$, so $\tau^\alpha=2^\alpha$. In particular, if $\alpha\g […]

Fix a model $M$ of a theory for which it makes sense to talk about $\omega$ ($M$ does not need to be a model of set theory, it could even be simply an ordered set with a minimum in which every element has an immediate successor and every element other than the minimum has an immediate predecessor; in this case we could identify $\omega^M$ with $M$ itself). W […]